A person close to him owed 4 million dirhams, by way of borrowing, without taking from him any document or document proving the nature of the relationship between them.In detail, a man filed a lawsuit against another, in which he sought to oblige him to 4 million dirhams and 500 thousand dirhams in compensation for material and moral damages.
The court of first instance ruled to reject the case in its case and oblige the complainant to pay fees and expenses. The Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims clarified in the reasons for its ruling that the court of first instance had been subject to adjudication in the litigation.
And it decided to dismiss the case in its case on the basis of evidence that the complainant is the one who bears the burden of proving the incident of advances or lending, which is the subject of the case, and that he did not provide any evidence proving the validity of his claim, and his statements regarding the incident were mere statements sent without support or evidence. My bank proves only the fact of the transfer but does not prove the fact of the debt, and the mere transfer of money does not indicate the cause of the claim and only proves the fact of the transfer of money, and thus the case lacks evidence to prove its validity, and it is based on no support from reality and law.
0 Comments